In a landmark judgment aimed at preserving the green cover of Kerala, the High Court has issued a directive to the State government, emphasizing stringent regulations on the cutting and removal of trees along roadways. The ruling, delivered by Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, underscores the imperative of preserving trees for their ecological significance and societal benefits, marking a significant victory for environmental conservationists and activists.
The court’s decision comes in response to a writ petition filed challenging the denial of a request to fell large trees obstructing the view of a building. The petitioners had sought permission to remove the trees, citing concerns about the safety of their building due to overhanging branches. However, the court’s scrutiny revealed that the true motive behind the petitioners’ request was primarily to enhance the visibility of their commercial establishment from the road.
Justice Kunhikrishnan, drawing inspiration from the poignant verses of renowned poet and environmentalist Smt. Sugathakumari, reiterated the profound importance of trees in sustaining life and fostering a healthier environment. Quoting from her poem, the judge emphasized the intrinsic value of trees, not only as providers of shade and habitat but also as essential contributors to air quality, biodiversity, and overall well-being.
The court’s ruling mandates that trees should only be felled if they pose a genuine threat to public safety, as determined by a committee established under previous government orders. Merely obstructing commercial activities or impeding views of buildings does not constitute sufficient grounds for tree removal. This directive aims to safeguard Kerala’s rich biodiversity and mitigate the adverse effects of deforestation and urbanization on the environment.
Addressing concerns raised by the petitioners regarding the hazardous positioning of certain branches, the court emphasized the need for a nuanced approach. Rather than resorting to wholesale tree removal, alternative measures should be explored to mitigate risks while preserving the ecological integrity of the area. The judgment underscores the principle that the interests of commercial entities must not supersede the broader ecological concerns and the well-being of local flora and fauna.
The court’s decision reflects a growing recognition of the critical role played by trees in mitigating climate change, combating air pollution, and enhancing the quality of life for communities. By prioritizing environmental conservation over short-term commercial interests, the ruling sets a precedent for sustainable development practices in Kerala and beyond.
Environmental activists and conservationists have welcomed the court’s verdict as a significant step towards protecting Kerala’s natural heritage. They emphasize the need for robust enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with the ruling and prevent unauthorized tree felling in the future. Public awareness campaigns and community engagement initiatives are also seen as vital components of efforts to promote tree preservation and sustainable urban development.





Leave a comment